Logic and Reasoning

نویسنده

  • PHILIP N. JOHNSON-LAIRD
چکیده

Logic captures the implications among sentences. A logical calculus consists of a precise definition of a language and a set of rules of inference that can be used to derive conclusions from premises. The rules are formal, that is, they operate on the form of sentences, not their meaning. The calculus, however, may have a semantics, which provides interpretations for all the sentences in the language.Modern logic lies at the heart of the development of computers and computer programming languages. However, logic is not easy to use in the evaluation of everyday inferences because no algorithm exists for translating such inferences into sentences in a logical calculusFa gap that the logician Bar-Hillel once referred to as the scandal of logic. Logic is also not a theory of how human beings reason. That topic is the province of psychology. Although psychologists studied deductive reasoning for almost the entire 20th century, they began to formulate theories of the process only in the past 25 years. Deductive reasoning is now under intensive investigation, andmore is known about it than any other variety of thinking. The aim of this article is accordingly to outline the general principles of logic; to describe current theories of human reasoning, which owe much to logic; and to outline what is known about the role of the brain in reasoning.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

ROBUSTNESS OF THE TRIPLE IMPLICATION INFERENCE METHOD BASED ON THE WEIGHTED LOGIC METRIC

This paper focuses on the robustness problem of full implication triple implication inference method for fuzzy reasoning. First of all, based on strong regular implication, the weighted logic metric for measuring distance between two fuzzy sets is proposed. Besides, under this metric, some robustness results of the triple implication method are obtained, which demonstrates that the triple impli...

متن کامل

Systematic literature review of fuzzy logic based text summarization

Information Overloadrq  is not a new term but with the massive development in technology which enables anytime, anywhere, easy and unlimited access; participation & publishing of information has consequently escalated its impact. Assisting userslq    informational searches with reduced reading surfing time by extracting and evaluating accurate, authentic & relevant information are the primary c...

متن کامل

Social Logic of Kitchen Space in Vernacular Architecture (Case Study: Qeshm Housing) – Examination and Analysis

Culture and social relations play a significant role in the formation of the structure of vernacular housing of any region, especially in the Islamic countries where privacy has a considerable effect on the vernacular culture, and consequently, on the house’s structure. Among the house spaces, the kitchen is more affected than other spaces by such issues so that its relations pattern with other...

متن کامل

Reasoning and Decision Making

2 Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (1p) 3 2.1 Logic and Combinatorics (1p) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1.1 Propositional Reasoning and Constraints Satisfaction (1p) 4 2.1.2 First-Order Logic and Its Restrictions (1.5p) . . . . . . . 5 2.1.3 Knowledge, Belief, Agents, and Modal Logic (0.75p) . . . 6 2.1.4 Logic Programming, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, and Preferences (0.75p) . ...

متن کامل

Syntactic Knowledge: A Logic of Reasoning, Communication and Cooperation

This paper presents a logic for reasoning about the explicit knowledge of agents who represent their knowledge as finite sets of logical formulae, and who can change their knowledge by reasoning and communicating. No assumptions about closure or consistency conditions on the sets, or about soundness or completeness of the reasoning mechanisms, are made. Traditional epistemic logic, based on mod...

متن کامل

Reasoning about Minimal Belief and Negation as

We investigate the problem of reasoning in the propositional fragment of MBNF, the logic of minimal belief and negation as failure introduced by Lifschitz, which can be considered as a unifying framework for several nonmonotonic formalisms, including default logic, autoepistemic logic, circumscription, epistemic queries, and logic programming. We characterize the complexity and provide algorith...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003